[whattajoke]

evo flaunt their degrees and education whenever they get their chance and constantly refer to the *actual* or *real* science degrees that some have, like coyoteman and rightwingprofessor, as if the degrees meant something and downplaying and scoffing at the degrees that creationists have.

See, this is the type of comment I was trying to get Ag's take on. He has "actual" and "real" science degrees and likes to flaunt them and worked hard for them. So I was wondering how he felt when his creationist ilk displayed disdain for such degrees.

As for the 2 former FReepers you mention, they haven't been around these parts for quite some time (years in RWP's case). What is the hangup around here with those guys? And for the record, I only scoff at creationists with fake degrees from diploma mills; a problem that plagues the movement.

And the constant taunts about how creationists never produced any *peer reviewed* papers or research of any kind.

Clarification: "never produced any peer reviewed papers having to do with creationism." Big difference.

Evos are ALWAYS passing themselves off as mentally superior because they don't fall for those fairy tales and mythology about some *giant, invisible man in the sky* who *everyone "KNOWS"* isn't real.

Not all those who accept the evidence for evolution are atheists. But I applaud you for noting that your beliefs consistent of fairy tales, mythology, and invisible sky gods.

[metmom]

So I was wondering how he felt when his creationist ilk displayed disdain for such degrees.

Who said that creationists disdained degrees in science?

As for the 2 former FReepers you mention, they haven't been around these parts for quite some time (years in RWP's case). What is the hangup around here with those guys?

It's irrelevant whether they've been around for a while or not. When they were, evos were constantly throwing their credentials in other's faces. Matter of fact, that has never been laid to rest as there are STILL evos who occasionally mention them.

What about evos with NO degrees? How are they qualified to speak on evolution then, if lack of a degree is an issue for creationists?

Not all those who accept the evidence for evolution are atheists. But I applaud you for noting that your beliefs consistent of fairy tales, mythology, and invisible sky gods.

No, but all atheists are evolutionists.

ANd thank you for reinforcing the stereotype and exactly demonstrating the point I was making.