There you go again, mentioning something having to do with mental illness in the pejorative! Are you now mentally ill also? I don't believe any one here called you mentally ill. Phony, yes. Mentally ill? No.
No, in fact it was you who tried to hide behind the mentally disabled to try to gain a cheap advantage in a debate with GGG even as you cast the same stones form another web site. I simply put GGG on notice about you.
Then your mouth became pathologically unhinged in a manner clearly frowned upon by FR standards. Any credibility you thought you had went with that.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but before you got banned from FR a couple years ago
True. Though my posting privilege was obviously restored, the atheist who started the flame war remains banned to this day on account of threats he made to those here at FR. The guy allegedly had a PhD in something too -- kite flying perhaps -- though not that that necessarily counts for much when he obviously demonstrates he had so little common sense to begin with -- much like yourself, in fact sans "PhD".
In fact, partially as a result of that flame war, soon afterward most of the site's Darwin Central crowd either opused out or just got banned outright. It eventually comes to light what you evos are really all about. Your sludgemouth has revealed as much about you already.
...you were just starting up your consulting firm in the early part of this decade.
Incorrect. I have owned this present consulting practice since 1988 and in 1998 - the year I chose to join FR, in fact, my firm acquired the firm which first hired me back in 1982. For the mathematically challenged such as yourself, 21 years is greater than 20 years by definition.
I also recall you on some rather informative threads about the Cipro issue; in which you made it quite clear you worked for the FDA at some point in the 90's along with some stints at a couple pharma companies.
Here you are only partially correct. This is likely, because, assuming you have ever been employed in your life, or are even employed now, unless all you did was mow lawns for your friends’ dads for cash under the table, you may have only received income by way of W-2's all your life.
For instance, unless you owned the franchise yourself, when you ran the Slurpee machine at the local 7-11, you were likely paid only as a W-2 employee – unless, here too, you happened to work "off-the-books," or as barter-in-exchange for provisions of some sort.
Maybe that included living space in the dumpster out behind the place too, with a spare set of keys to the porta-potty facing the traffic on the interstate.
Yes, you are successful. Yes, you know quite [a bit - ed.] about about your chosen field...
Which is why you wrote this in post #139: “Your seething post seems to point to a failed academic career.”
So what you are really saying is that when you wrote what you wrote here, you wrote it knowing full-well it was lie all along.
And again you have just proved what has been my entire point about you right from the start!
BUSTED AGAIN!
...(I used to enjoy your defense of the FDA and the Bayer - I think - Cipro issue) but even a dimwitted dullard like me has the ability to retain information.
The Cipro discussion to which you refer from roughly 8 years ago IIRC was with some guy who posed as a patent attorney, finding himself in need of a serious dressing down who understood nothing about rights such as they pertain to intellectual property, and as they pertain to patents and patent law in a pharmaceutical context. This discussion was likely in the context of the Medicare prescription drug bill being debated at the time.
You have imperfectly retained some information, but without context, like sterile data found in some run-on spread sheet, such "information" does not rise to the point of one actually having acquired any amount of knowledge from it which has any inherent value.
Had you ever owned and successfully run an incorporated business, you'd know better what one is able to do with such an entity, how one enjoys tax-advantaged distributive income apart from that of mere W-2s, and how it is that I could actually run a consulting firm while simultaneously and legitimately serving for a time in government as well as at other times serving as a formal corporate officer. Get an MBA, get a company, get a financial planner, have a successful career.
Career success and satisfaction must be something completely foreign to you, or maybe it is something that has simply eluded you to this point. One gets a sense of that latent envy which percolates to the surface occasionally. Best to put a check on that. It will consume you otherwise.
You assumed you knew something about what did or did not constitute my own personal success, and I demonstrated a few posts back that your comparative lack of credentials or accomplishment likely places your "skills-set," such as it is, or isn't, somewhere substantially outside the same league.
Your commentary continues to affirm the "dimwitted" and "dullard" part of that self-styled personal description quite appropriately. I'd just add to that "... who is completely out of his depth of knowledge in the subject matter which resides in a creation vs. evolution debate thread, and uses natural sympathies extended toward the mentally handicapped community to hide behind, even as he uses the same diminutive references to their state of being to lodge his own cowardly insults behind the back of another Freeper on another web site."
There, fixed it.