Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
"Reporters worthy of the name would have pointed out that buying a gun for a family member or friend as a gift is not a straw purchase. It's a violation of the law only to buy a gun for a prohibited person. "

This is absolutely dead wrong, and I am surprised it originated from N.R.A. Anyone who accepts the transfer (not just purchase) of a firearm from an FFL commits a straw purchase if he does it on behalf of another person. There is no exception for family members, nor does it matter whether the third party is eligible to own the thing or not.

See page 4 of the instructions on form 4473.

5 posted on 10/22/2009 11:06:41 AM PDT by sig226 (My President was President of the week at the Norwegian Slough Academy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sig226
Thanks for the link.

"Reporters worthy of the name would have pointed out that buying a gun for a family member or friend as a gift is not a straw purchase. It's a violation of the law only to buy a gun for a prohibited person."

This is absolutely dead wrong, and I am surprised it originated from N.R.A. Anyone who accepts the transfer (not just purchase) of a firearm from an FFL commits a straw purchase if he does it on behalf of another person. There is no exception for family members, nor does it matter whether the third party is eligible to own the thing or not.

What's wrong with a gift to someone who isn't prohibited?

7 posted on 10/22/2009 11:37:43 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sig226

The statement by the NRA is correct. Question 11.a allows that.


9 posted on 10/22/2009 11:53:21 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson