Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Winniesboy
As it happens, at the moment both major parties (for different reasons) are threatening radical changes to the BBC

If they can enact the changes, then by definition they control it. I rest my case.

74 posted on 10/22/2009 9:16:40 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: abb

‘Control’ implies day-to-day supervision or management, which doesn’t exist. They can, as you say, enact changes: but only through the cumbersome mechanism of periodic primary legislation. In theory, of course, such legislation could indeed introduce a mechanism for day-to-day state control: but as yet it hasn’t, it doesn’t now, and there’s little likelihood of it doing so in future.


80 posted on 10/22/2009 9:23:55 AM PDT by Winniesboy (61 years a NHS patient; 7 years a Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson