And the point of that is? (And may I suggest English as the language we use on this thread? What is the subject of the verb "doesn't?") When you run out of arguments you just start with saying "It's not true just because you say it is?" There MIGHT be SOME integrity to that argument if your side didn't run like a scalded dog from the initial contention and bring up a flurry of other issues like chaff to obscure the dialectical and rhetorical rout brought on by the initial assault.
I’ll bet you even think it’s the one true church.
LOL! Your side just never quits! Gambit declined.
Ahem. Somebody puts up an article from one newspaper which reports that another newspaper reports that yet another periodical says that somebody wrote something or other, AND on the basis of this ridiculous sourcing the headline is "Marx gets Vatican thumbs up," and we feelthy papists are supposed to defend ourselves from that risible accusation.
That tactic turns out to be an epic fail so now we're going to argue ecclesiology? Why is your side changing the subject that your side brought up?
You do have a way with words, MD.
You failed to answer the point of the bishops supporting the Health Care bill if abortion was not in the bill and one other issue. Otherwise the bishops position is EVERY ONE should be covered in the bill.