Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWGinger
I wish I understood who exactly does have “ standing”

In order to have standing to sue, the plaintiff must generally have suffered or will suffer a real injury that is distinct from the injury suffered by the public-at-large. In my opinion, the only people with standing to challenge 0bama's constitutional qualifications to serve as POTUS are opposing candidates who had a real chance of winning the election and/or their political party.

Standing is just the first step, however. The action must also be timely, and under the laws of all if not every state, the time to challenge the qualifications of a candidate is when the name placed on the ballot, not after the election.

70 posted on 10/21/2009 10:50:07 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Labyrinthos

‘Chance of winning’ is specious and straight from the DOJ talking points. The right to a fair election process is founded upon legal election ... unless you’re an Eric Holder minion of course.


72 posted on 10/21/2009 10:56:28 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Labyrinthos

The Constitution leaves to the “Militia’s” the responsibility to enforce the Law of the Land (ie. the Constitution).

Militia members swear and oath to uphold the Constitution.
0bama has precious little time.

Grab your pitchforks and head to D.C


155 posted on 10/21/2009 6:03:17 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson