Excuse me, Mr. ESP, but the last time I looked, none of these cases has a snowball’s chance in h*ll. Obama has been sworn in. It is very unlikely that any federal district court is going to do anything based upon “suspicion.” Certain of us have teased and joked about Orly, but not this guy who only lost today.
The problem with Orly isn’t that she’s “troublesome and fights like hell”, it is that she fights like a maniac, “full of sound and fury yet signifying nothing.” That is why she got sanctions put on her.
And no, I am probably one of the most honest persons you will ever encounter. I tell it like I see whether I like it or not. Or, whether you like it or not. The truth is what the truth is. And FWIW, I hate being me right now, and I am about to take off for a year or two and try to get my health back so that 10 years from now, I will like being me again.
parsy, who just tells it like it is (or like he sees it)whichever
I don’t even know you, but I kow you better than you know yourself.
All that vitriolic poison in your veins is making you ill and I suspected as much. Your resentments are killing you and you would do well to examine your conscience to rediscover natural honesty.
The problem with an expert like yourself, is that he is always there to tell you when you are wrong, wrong wrong but he will never lead you to a victory because he is to ill and dishonest.
The reason you are praising this attorney is that he lost and that is what you want. I would not want you to cover my back in combat. At the slightest sign of a scuffle you’d be sending up the white flag throwing your buddies under the bus just so you could be heard at the microphones pontificating why we lost and why we never had a chance.
With this kind of dishonesty and deceit in your heart you’ll never get well. Sorry!
Fortunately for the rest of us you are only partially correct although your hubris knows no bounds. You call them like you see them through jaundiced eyes. The suits that will be dismissed and that have been dismissed are the ones that rely upon general Article III standing, the well-known lack of standing of the “general taxpayer.”