Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
This is why a quo warranto action needs to be filed in the D.C. District Court. Standing would not be an issue.
38 posted on 10/21/2009 9:55:11 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. STATE OF WISCONSIN v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION.

No US District Court other than the DC District Court may entertain a quo warranto proceeding.

NEWMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. WILLIAM J. FRIZZELL:

Usurpation of a public office from an early day was treated as a crime, and, like all other crimes, could be prosecuted only in the name of the King by his duly authorized law officers. When a judgment was obtained against the intruder he was not only ousted from his office, but fined for his criminal usurpation. A private citizen could no more prosecute such a proceeding in his own name than he could in his own name prosecute for the crime of murder…


54 posted on 10/21/2009 10:13:47 AM PDT by WVPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson