Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz
"If there was no comment, how do you know their thinking? Do you think your telepathic? That's pretty nutty. "

That's not nutty. That's a practical understanding of how the Supreme Court works. Go back and look at the myriad of cases that were denied cert when the Vietnam War was challenged on it's Constitutionality. In several instances, dissenting Judges did offer comments - comments that were very sympathetic to the plaintiff's position.

Several of these kinds of cases have been denied certiorari the last year - all without comment. While it's not wholly conclusive, it is persuasive that there's not a single, sympathetic ear on the court regarding this matter.

285 posted on 10/27/2009 12:47:59 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

Unless the justices are simply unsympathetic to compelling arguments.


286 posted on 10/27/2009 1:21:08 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson