Replies

Yup, but not dismissed based on the merits of the case.

I believe you do not understand the foundation of my position. Elected, sworn in, certified - does not matter a wit if a candidate is not eligible!

Suppose, an individual ran for a position on a Condo board and won the most votes. Also, that individual did not live in the condo. If the Condo “constitution” required board members to live in said condo, I am afraid the election “winner” does not sit on the Condo board until he buys a condo unit.

Finally, yes 0bama bungled the oath of office at the public inauguration. The oath needs to be stated complete and correct. A redo was held a few days later, no witness, no media, behind closed doors.
Please share with me your evidence 0bama was properly sworn in.

A redo was held a few days later, no witness, no media, behind closed doors.

It was the very next day. And if there were "no witnesses," who do you think took the picture of Roberts administering the oath to Obama?

Heck, you can even listen to the audio of the oath for yourself.

Yup, but not dismissed based on the merits of the case.

I believe you do not understand the foundation of my position. Elected, sworn in, certified - does not matter a wit if a candidate is not eligible!

Suppose, an individual ran for a position on a Condo board and won the most votes. Also, that individual did not live in the condo. If the Condo “constitution” required board members to live in said condo, I am afraid the election “winner” does not sit on the Condo board until he buys a condo unit.

Finally, yes 0bama bungled the oath of office at the public inauguration. The oath needs to be stated complete and correct. A redo was held a few days later, no witness, no media, behind closed doors.
Please share with me your evidence 0bama was properly

I understand the foundation of your position.
You’re wrong about the circumstances of the re-do of the Oath. You can listen to the audio of it for yourself and there was a pool reporter there to cover the 25 second event. The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court was there to witness the event and he’s a staunch consevative.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17778.html

My further evidence is that Barack Hussein Obama II has signed scores of laws into effect, sent thousands of American troops into harm’s way as Commander-in-Chief, signed many executive orders, and appointed hundreds high governmental officials and federal judges. Not one of those actions of a president has been successfully challenged in any court.