To: Molon Labbie
If it was an execution, why shoot him once in the back, when a headshot or a series of headshots, would do the job much more efficiently? The shot in the back did not do the job it seems, since Grant died six hours later.
Dead is dead.
This dumbass cop is clearly guilty of murder.
Why does the testimony of the other officers on the scene say that Mehserle was visibly distraught over the shooting, saying Oh my God, oh my God over and over again?
Because cops are liars?
There is no way they are going to get murder 1st or even 2nd. Manslaughter, yes.
Murder 1, almost certainly not. He is clearly guilty of murder 2 - "a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life."
Pulling a gun where none was needed clearly qualifies.
That said, the lying cops issue above, along with the typical court bias in favor of cops, police paid expert witnesses and the like will almost certainly result in this useless f-tard getting off.
I just hope the rioters reacting to that take out their justifiable anger on the appropriate targets.
13 posted on
10/20/2009 9:40:29 AM PDT by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo
Well, at least we agree on probable outcome but it’s a shame you wish to see more riots. Rioters always tear up the innocent people’s property and innocents get hurt or killed.
Somehow I don’t think the police are going to let the rioters try and take any revenge against them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson