Skip to comments.
How to stop doubting and love the climate models
OregonLive ^
| October 17, 2009
| JULIANE FRY, PHD
Posted on 10/20/2009 5:11:26 AM PDT by crazyhorse691
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Another elitist lecture for us "scientific illiterates" and "deniers".
To: crazyhorse691
Reading the sage comments I stumbled upon this, “.Don’t use record cold temperatures for your bench mark...take a look at the shorter winter seasons and longer summers...these are a more accurate measure of climate change....”.
2
posted on
10/20/2009 5:14:39 AM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: crazyhorse691
Hell, if you can’t bully us peons into believing this BS then try the approach of dazzling us with your incomprehensible babble and bloated verbiage.
3
posted on
10/20/2009 5:17:02 AM PDT
by
rj45mis
To: crazyhorse691
So we should ignore winter snows starting in mid October, too, eh? These people are delusional.
4
posted on
10/20/2009 5:18:07 AM PDT
by
piytar
(This tag deleted by the Ministry of Truth. Love Big Brother. Or else!)
To: crazyhorse691
This guy speaks of consensus, when there is none.
For every scientist saying there is global warming , there is another saying there isnt.
This clown is only listening to the consensus he wants to hear and telling us we are stupid for listening to the opposite side.
5
posted on
10/20/2009 5:19:33 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: crazyhorse691
And, Nov. 18, Al Gore, winner of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize along with the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, will speak at Keller Auditorium as part of the Portland Arts and Lectures Series.Nahhhh, doesn't impress me. They literally hand those awards out these days.
6
posted on
10/20/2009 5:19:41 AM PDT
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: crazyhorse691
7
posted on
10/20/2009 5:20:02 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: crazyhorse691; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
8
posted on
10/20/2009 5:20:06 AM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: crazyhorse691
This warming can only be explained when including human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 ). Huh? Looks like an untested theory substituting for a conclusion.
9
posted on
10/20/2009 5:20:31 AM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(3%)
To: crazyhorse691
The global average surface temperature has increased by about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850, with most of the increase since 1950. This warming can only be explained when including human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 ). Absolutely ridiculous. The Little Ice Age ended in about 1850. Since then, temperatures have edged up -- what else would you expect after an Ice Age ends?
Temperatures were higher 1000 years ago than they are now. Claiming that "only" human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide can explain such changes is bald-faced lying.
10
posted on
10/20/2009 5:20:56 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: crazyhorse691
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Rom.1:22
11
posted on
10/20/2009 5:25:11 AM PDT
by
kickonly88
(I love fossil fuel!)
To: crazyhorse691
What a moron. This guy's the poster child for over-educated boobs.
This warming can only be explained when including human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 ).
Even if we trusted your data sourcing, correlation does not equal causation. Your failure to comprehend earth's complex climate system is no reason to grasp at straws by employing selective data models.
Ever notice the only causes of climate change they can identifiy are those which can (supposedly) be influenced by human behavior? For example, solar activity has created proportional temperature changes on both earth and mars, but since the government can't legislate the sun's behavior, its influence is dismissed out of hand.
12
posted on
10/20/2009 5:26:34 AM PDT
by
ConservativeWarrior
(In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
To: crazyhorse691
Juliane Fry, Ph.D
13
posted on
10/20/2009 5:26:46 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
To: crazyhorse691; rj45mis; piytar; Venturer; GreenAccord; onedoug; steelyourfaith; Eagle Eye; ...
But what an arrogant fool to pick a “Dr Strangelove” title.
14
posted on
10/20/2009 5:27:40 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: crazyhorse691
This warming can only be explained when including human contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2 ). Propaganda masquerading as science. All this proves is that a PhD isn't worth much. Years of education and still no common sense.
15
posted on
10/20/2009 5:29:35 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: crazyhorse691
She teaches chemistry at Reed College I didn't read past the first paragraph, but skimmed to the bottom and saw this. No surprise. You will not find a more wretched hive of Commie scum and villainy in Portland.
16
posted on
10/20/2009 5:30:01 AM PDT
by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: crazyhorse691
What does love have to do with science ?
We are on the verge of one of the worse winters many of us have ever seen, and one of the scientists who could have predicted it, is instead talking about loving computer models and stopping global warming ? This is simply negligence.
To: crazyhorse691
It's been settled with a ringing "yes" among the scientific community. STOP RIGHT HERE. No need to go on reading this article. This is the basic lie that has been repeated over and over and is now being taught in our schools. It is simply not true and we cannot allow it to go unchallenged. Real scientists know it's a scam. UN scientists will believe anything they are told as long as the grant money keeps flowing, and it only flows to the true believers who are willing to deny the scientific fact that global warming is NOT MAN MADE>
To: crazyhorse691
Unfortunately, OregonLive has a devoted following of PDX libtard mouthbreathers eager to jump on anyone who does not worship the progressive orthodoxy.
19
posted on
10/20/2009 5:31:14 AM PDT
by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: crazyhorse691
“Apparently, we scientists have failed to explain to the entire public how we have come to understand the climate system”
Oh really? Juliann Fry is not a scientist, since she’s not looking at all of the data. I don’t care what her bloated credentials are. The earth is in a cooling trend, that’s been proven. Arctic Ice pack increased significantly this past year.
Co2 levels haven’t dropped, yet the world is cooling.
How do you explain that, wing-nut? Screw your models.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson