Something tells me someone didn’t check to see what “soft tissue” preserved inside dinosaur bone fossils actually entailed, and is therefore assuming someone found large chunks of marrow or something. Yes, soft tissue indications were found, mainly collagens, and were encased in rock themselves.
“Yes, soft tissue indications were found, mainly collagens, and were encased in rock themselves.”
Now, now, this is way too complex for “creation science”, and way too fact-laden.
I’ve tried explaining this on previous threads, and pointing out another in the unbroken series of lies that is “creation science” to no avail.
I wish you better luck, but these people are uncommonly stupid, and uncommonly stubborn. They take full advantage of their God-given ignorance.
Why don't you try reading the article.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html?c=y&page=1
There has been exactly ZERO “soft, squishy tissues” found in dinosaur bones, Dr....er....Brian Thomas MS*....and if Brian Thomas MS* knew WTF he was talking about, he’d stop lying about it.....but the truth isn’t what B rian Thomas MS* is interested in.
Yes, soft tissue indications were found, mainly collagens, and were encased in rock themselves.
Now, now, this is way too complex for “creation science”, and way too fact-laden.
Well it's getting hard to know what to believe if I just listen to the evos alone. You guys need to argue this out amongst yourselves.