Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Mulling over Uranium Enrichment in Iran (Is 0 about to accept a Nuclear Iran?)
FARS News Agency ^ | 10/19/2009 | Unattributed

Posted on 10/19/2009 1:10:02 PM PDT by mojito

Representatives from Iran, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and three western states have convened in two-day talks in Vienna on October 19-20 to discuss supply of nuclear fuel for Tehran reactor.

Informed sources close to the talks in Vienna said that the US has in a series of secret meetings informed its European partners of Washington's decision on acceptance of uranium enrichment in Iran.

The sources reiterated that a number of Washington's EU allies have voiced strong protest against the decision, calling it a too big concession to Iran and a second blow to their stance by the US administration after the White House gave up suspension of enrichment activities in Iran as a precondition for talks with the Islamic Republic.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.farsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iranianpropaganda; nuclear; nuclearweapons; propaganda; uranium; uraniumenrichment; zero
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Informed sources close to the talks in Vienna said that the US has in a series of secret meetings informed its European partners of Washington's decision on acceptance of uranium enrichment in Iran.

21 posted on 10/19/2009 3:15:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

That was the plan all along.


22 posted on 10/19/2009 3:31:43 PM PDT by freedomtrail (To hell and back reliability.....sigarms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
Sounds like ...

CARTER/KOREA II


23 posted on 10/19/2009 4:02:54 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (I will DIE with Israel BY MY SIDE, rather than LIVE with the CHAINS of ISLAM on my Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

24 posted on 10/19/2009 4:55:59 PM PDT by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

HOPELESS


25 posted on 10/19/2009 5:05:57 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojito
(Is 0 about to accept a Nuclear Iran?)

He already has! Long ago!

26 posted on 10/19/2009 5:07:06 PM PDT by airborne (I'm from an older generation. When killing the enemy was a good thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

ping


27 posted on 10/19/2009 5:38:29 PM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mojito
The subject of Iran's uranium enrichment and WMD aspirations cannot be settled without several other parties participating who have a stake in the outcome.

The Sunnis (primarily Arabs), the Israelis, and the Europeans all have excellent reasons to keep the Iranians from obtaining WMD. The Russians probably want a belligerent Iran, it seems to destabilize the region and drive up the price of oil.

So it is hard to imagine that Bam alone can agree to Iran getting WMD. Israel in particular is not going to go along with that idea. Would Bam stop Israel if they try to take out the Iranian enrichment infrastructure?

Bam is playing a very dangerous game. And not one that seems to have US best interests at heart.

schu

28 posted on 10/19/2009 6:53:37 PM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson