To: Hank Kerchief
There will no doubt be violence in the future, but it will not be a revolution. It will be what is properly called, "civil unrest," consisting of riots and purposeless attacks on groups of individuals and businesses, and it will be totally counter-productive, because it will give the government an excuse to enact and impose more draconian laws—perhaps even marshal law. This guy's an idiot. If he doesn't know what "martial law" is, how can we take him seriously?
13 posted on
10/19/2009 7:55:05 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I don’t under stand what you mean.
Can you elaborate a little more please?
Thanks Ken
24 posted on
10/19/2009 8:25:29 AM PDT by
kennyboy509
(Ha! I kill me!)
To: ShadowAce
Well, please don’t take him seriously. (I notice the word is corrected in the original. Looks like an editing mistake to me.)
27 posted on
10/19/2009 8:29:39 AM PDT by
jswift
To: ShadowAce
“This guy’s an idiot. If he doesn’t know what ‘martial law’ is, how can we take him seriously?”
Yeah, he loses all credibility with that.
33 posted on
10/19/2009 8:43:23 AM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: ShadowAce
Yup. Dude IS an idiot; and panty-waste to boot.
84 posted on
10/19/2009 2:11:17 PM PDT by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: ShadowAce
Re your post 13, regarding “marshal law”. I too picked up on that. Such a gross error always makes me wonder about the author.
I see this exact spelling error quite a bit on FR but that’s understandable. Most Freepers are not professional writers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson