Well, then you better call the RNC and tell them to stop backing Scuzzy and get behind Hoffman. Because the fact of the matter is that we’re not going to let Scuzzy go to Washington come hell or high water. It’s really more constructive to attack the source of the problem (a tone deaf RNC) rather than the result (a 3rd party challenge splitting the vote).
Your response is odd, telling me what to do and then lecturing me on being constructive.
I'll repeat what I said.
The Blue Dog label is BS. Owens will be a balls-to-the-wall, Pelosi liberal.
Deal with that reality.
BTW, here's another fact for you if you can handle it. The RNC didn't pick Scuzzi. The RNC was handed Scuzzi by a bunch of local county party chairs. What the RNC has done with this mess is to tell Scuzzi that they will back her if she agrees to take more conservative positions, including the tax pledge.
Like it or not, those are the facts and it's most "constuctive" to at least get the facts straight before coming up with a solution.
I never said that the RNC picked her. However, they did decide to bail her out and they are running ads against Hoffman. They have made themselves part of the problem.
What I took from your comment was that the RINO was better, because the blue dog label is BS and Owens will be a Pelosi lap dog.
Lap dog he may be, but the Republican party at various levels has created this problem entirely on its own. And it is entirely THEIR fault if a Dem wins this seat.
As far as I’m concerned, if we can’t have Hoffman, then an Owens win is preferable to Scuzzybama. A Pelosi lap dog with a D next to his name is preferable to one with an R.