Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
We don’t just make up laws here on the spot, as desirable as we might wish that to be in a certain situation.

That's true and i don't think the sheriff was saying he wanted to "make up laws on the spot", just that he wanted to work with the DA and the Feds to see what laws are already on the book that might be applicable here in order to move it up from a misdemeanor to something more appropriate (not just to protect local authorities from public pressure but also to serve as a deterrent to other wackos who would think "gee, do something like this and all i have to worry about is a lousy misdemeanor!? haha, cool!"). Given the unusual nature of this case, i think it is warranted to take such a step.

40 posted on 10/17/2009 8:14:57 PM PDT by Humbug (hmm mmm mmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Humbug

I think civil damages are going to be more onerous than any criminal penalty. Plus there will be the public shame. Any publicity bid has backfired in his face knowing that he caused rescuers to go on a dangerous wild goose chase.


44 posted on 10/17/2009 8:20:05 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson