Skip to comments.
Sharpton threatens to sue Rush over op-ed remarks
Associated Press ^
| Oct. 17, 2009
Posted on 10/17/2009 4:36:03 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: South40
Al Charlatan doess not want to answer questions under oath which is what he would have to do should he file a suit. You have reason to believe that the Least Reverend Al is above perjury?
41
posted on
10/17/2009 5:18:51 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Go ahead Al, and keep some starving lawyers working. Bet Rush can get better ones and feed them longer than you can.
42
posted on
10/17/2009 5:19:46 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Oh geez the nappy headed bro is upset. Too darn bad you low life scuz.
43
posted on
10/17/2009 5:21:31 PM PDT
by
Pilated
To: Pontiac
You have reason to believe that the Least Reverend Al is above perjury? Above it? Not even close. Would he want to avoid having to do it? You bet.
Charlatan may be a race-baiting POS but he's smart enough to avoid putting himself in the position of having to lie under oath.
44
posted on
10/17/2009 5:26:50 PM PDT
by
South40
(I did not know President Ronald Reagan, but he knew me.)
To: South40
Agreed... There will be no lawsuit from this slug.
In my many years of experience in business, I have ALWAYS witnessed one constant - when someone threatens to sue, he really has no case, and knows it. A person who really has been damaged and has a real clear cause of action doesn't’t threaten suit, he simply brings it and sues.
Sharpton’s gross inability to keep his pie-hole shut is only exceeded by his manifest irrelevance in all things political, social and financial or anything else of any significance in our world.
45
posted on
10/17/2009 5:32:25 PM PDT
by
SterlingSilver
(If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck... its a duck!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Reminds me of my dog’s philosophy. If you can’t eat it or screw it, piss on it. What a maroon.
46
posted on
10/17/2009 5:35:43 PM PDT
by
Samizdat
To: RummyChick
“it’s an accident to allow an apartheid ambulance service in the middle of Crown Heights.””A JEWISH CHARITY ambulance service tried to HELP the mortally wounded black child.
Sharpton is the definition of moral inversion.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Support college football.
Boycott the NFL.
48
posted on
10/17/2009 5:57:46 PM PDT
by
bigoil
To: Free ThinkerNY
Bring it on, sharp *ss. You’ll get your big stupid butt handed to you.
To: Free ThinkerNY
What does he have to prove, he has NOTHING,Sharpton. Rush will mop up on Sharpton!
50
posted on
10/17/2009 6:30:00 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
(I believe in THE BOOK that promises VICTORY OVER THE WORLD!:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: bigoil
51
posted on
10/17/2009 6:31:27 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
(I believe in THE BOOK that promises VICTORY OVER THE WORLD!:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: Tzimisce
But in the end, since Rush is looking at taking Al Sharpton to court, he could mop up on Sharpton!
52
posted on
10/17/2009 6:32:59 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
(I believe in THE BOOK that promises VICTORY OVER THE WORLD!:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: dennisw
I know who to bet on just so long as they don’t get an OJ jury. Therein lies a very large problem. There are venues where Rush would have zero chance of winning -- even if he had video of Rev. Al acting as charged. Not to mention DNA evidence...
53
posted on
10/17/2009 6:43:46 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Free ThinkerNY
For every $100,000 a month Rush spends on lawyers to bankrupt this bozo, he will reap ten times that in publicity.
54
posted on
10/17/2009 6:55:01 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Why not "interpret" your tax returns like the Supreme Court "interprets" the Constitution?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Try it, Al, please try it.
55
posted on
10/17/2009 6:59:50 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Imagine the uproar when people imagine what Rush says?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Sharpton’s chance of winning such a suit would be determined entirely by the nature of the judge and jury. If the suit were tried in D.C., he could win.
56
posted on
10/17/2009 7:18:41 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I don’t know the truth of Rush’s allegations.
He may just be yanking Sharptons chain.
57
posted on
10/17/2009 7:23:23 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Balding_Eagle
**He may just be yanking Sharptons chain.**
There have been many black on Jew, black on Korean, black on white RIOTS in NYC.. and EVERYTIME.. Al NOTSOSHARP was there ,either at the BEGINNING or Immediately thereafter.
Yo AL ..you do realize... you LOSE.. we go back to the OLD WORD... no more African BS for you!!
58
posted on
10/17/2009 8:15:01 PM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(I will DIE with Israel BY MY SIDE, rather than LIVE with the CHAINS of ISLAM on my Back!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
59
posted on
10/17/2009 8:55:44 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
To: okie01
Al Sharpton suing Rush in NY. Civil trials in NY might be tried by judges or juries. I don’t know. Plus Rush could get an OJ judge. Plenty of them out there
60
posted on
10/17/2009 11:13:18 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Ir's not the Wheel, It's the Carousel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson