Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Huckabee 29, Romney 24, Palin 18
Hotair ^ | 10/17/2009 | Allahpundit

Posted on 10/17/2009 9:39:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: MNJohnnie

I agree!

The front runner, now, will NOT be the nominee.

It never works that way.


21 posted on 10/17/2009 9:53:15 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu

Huck is simply wrong on several issues.

He does not understand economics very well.

He is far too much of a trade protectionist.

He is acceptable, if nominated, but not my first choice by a long shot.


22 posted on 10/17/2009 9:54:49 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu
What in the Sam Hill are you talking about? The Founding Fathers were not some group of bible thumping, theocrats regardless of what revisionism you choose to cling to.

Jefferson and Madison were men of reason and enlightenment, not Scripture. Ben Franklin was ambivalent at best, antagonistic and irreverent. George Washington couldn't care less if those who fought alongside him were Jews, Catholics or Mohammattans.

No republic is fit for evil men.

23 posted on 10/17/2009 9:56:38 AM PDT by fortunate sun (Fight the marxist occupation of America. Support the Healthcare Insurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

24 posted on 10/17/2009 9:56:57 AM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Well, neither of us has data, so it’s hard to say. But I find it pretty impossible that Palin, who was on the GOP national ticket, spoke at the RNC convention as VP candidate, was the subject of a Dave Letterman scandal, is coming out with a bestselling book, and is the obsession of liberals everywhere, somehow has lower name recognition than Mike Huckabee, who, IIRC, didn’t make it past SC primary, and has a low rated show on cable news and was an unknown governor from Arkansas.


25 posted on 10/17/2009 9:56:59 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
You need some talking points.

Do those “people” you talk to, realize that Goldman-Sachs is, pretty much, the “bench” for future Democrat candidates, and a piggy bank for Democrat candidates?

Do those people understand that Obama received more money, in the last 10 years, from mortgage, Wall Street, Banking and hedge-fund interests than ANY other politician? And this, despite the fact that Obama has only been on the national stage for a very short period of time?

Your friends are idiots.

Uninformed idiots.

You need to inform them.

26 posted on 10/17/2009 9:57:38 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WHAT?!?!

Are even conservatives gone CRAZY?!?!?!

Reverse the order and I’ll believe this isn’t a joke.


27 posted on 10/17/2009 9:58:12 AM PDT by J40000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
From HotAir's own poll:

Liz Cheney 13% (404 votes)
Huckabee 8% (246 votes)
Palin 65% (2,053 votes)
Pawlenty 4% (121 votes)
Romney 10% (322 votes)
Total Votes: 3,146

Sorry Huckster. You're so 2008

28 posted on 10/17/2009 9:58:26 AM PDT by McGruff (Go rogue baby, go rogue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu

Yup. They've got all their screws in order alright.
29 posted on 10/17/2009 10:00:11 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

These internet polls are Huck’s main problem. His support is not high tech and Sarah’s is.


30 posted on 10/17/2009 10:00:25 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No no no! No Hucklebee! He would not be much better than obama. We need a real conservative!


31 posted on 10/17/2009 10:00:49 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu

He may be a Christian, but he is not a conservative. With conservative values comes Christian values. Christian values do not bring conservative values: Example- Jimmy Carter


32 posted on 10/17/2009 10:03:02 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
He would not be much better than obama.

Now let's not exagerrate. He would be MUCH MUCH better than Obama.
33 posted on 10/17/2009 10:04:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (wH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun
While I understand your point, you should, at least, understand that ALL of our founders were PROFOUNDLY enfluenced by Christianity.
Jefferson, for one, rewrote the New Testament, simply taking out all of the miracles of Jesus, which he felt were not necessary for the faith, as the wisdom of Jesus could stand on its own, without miracles.

I suggest, “Christianity and the Constitution” by Eidsmoe, as a good read.

http://www.amazon.com/Christianity-Constitution-Faith-Founding-Fathers/dp/0801052319

“Our Constitution was written for a moral and religious people, it is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other” Adams.

34 posted on 10/17/2009 10:07:58 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The ONLY benefit of obama is that he is screwing up so badly and inspiring a conservative movement. If Huckleberry or McShamnesty had been elected, this grass-roots conservative uprising would not be happening. They would be voted out in 2012 and conservatism would be in a downward spiral. Citizens are realizing what liberalism/socialism is, thanks to obama. I just pray that he doesn’t do too much damage before 2012.


35 posted on 10/17/2009 10:08:24 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You know what the sad thing is? They don’t care as long as they are being taken care of.....

I did not vote for O nor do I intend to the next go around.

Healthcare—people are loving the fact that the democrats are doing what they are doing.

I tell them: It is better if they leave things alone, and let the states run their own healthcare for people who cannot afford it.


36 posted on 10/17/2009 10:09:26 AM PDT by hsmomx3 (GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I suspect this is the “value voters” thowing a snit because Huckabee showed up at their Convention while Palin did not. Other then that nothing much has happened since July that can explain this swing to Huckabee

Interesting that Palin son Track came home from Iraq that day. Would think “value voters” would value a politician who lives their values over one who is a shameless pander. But apparently catering to the "Values voters" egos is more important then living their values.

37 posted on 10/17/2009 10:10:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Rasmussen: Huckabee 29, Romney 24, Palin 18

...Rudy Giuliani once pulled something like 45 percent before last year’s primaries. Perspective.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

With off-year polls, name recognition is king. Huck has a weekly TV show on FNC, a network popular with the GOP base. He also has a radio show that replaced Paul Harvey on the local conservative talk station.

I haven't seen much of Romney or Palin lately. If they want to stay in the game, they need to get out more and keep a higher public profile. Perhaps a book tour for Sarah will get her going again.

38 posted on 10/17/2009 10:10:44 AM PDT by stillonaroll (Nominate a non-RINO in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Healthcare—people are loving the fact that the democrats are doing what they are doing.

Then why in every poll does 55-57% say they oppose it?

39 posted on 10/17/2009 10:11:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
Why Huckabee? Why the appeal? I don’t get it!

What we are seeing is the winner of a popularity contest. He's not Presidential material..don't worry.

sw

40 posted on 10/17/2009 10:12:21 AM PDT by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson