On many of the PUMA webbies, it has been theorized that the decision to ‘annoint’ BHO WAS made back IN 2004. The reason being Obama’s willingness to destroy the dollar/economy vs. Clinton(s) opposition to the plan. That is part of the reason why Hillary faced corrupt early caucus; had delegates and super delegates taken away.
The timing of the public acknowledgement of (at that time) a non issue by someone as corrupt as Frank raises all kinds of warnings with me.
The Won came out of virtual thin air to win the Oval Office. Great luck, or alot of preplanning.
There is too much ‘smoke’ for there not to be a ‘fire.’
My opinion on why the Birth Certificate issue is still in the courts, is that it is a nagging reminder to Obama to keep him in line; and not veer off plan. Do that and the ‘powers’ drop the paperwork and Obama is taken from office and becomes a blemish on Presidency.
Hard to believe that the anointers would be thinking of running Obama (who was still in the IL state Senate in '04) in 2008, at a time in 2004 when Kerry was probably considered likely to beat Bush. Do you really think that they would plot against a future Kerry re-election bid back then? Would the Kerry people have let O give a prime time speech at the 2004 Dem convention if they thought that O had such ideas for '08?
No, the PUMAs don't make sense with this theory. They were too upset at being beaten by dirty tactics within their own party to think logically.
The very earliest the Obamatons could have started their planning for his anointment would be the day after the election in '04, and Frank made his remarks before then.
BTW, can anyone state with certainty when Frank formally endorsed O against HRC for the Dem nomination? How early was it?
Frank never impressed me as being particular bright, even in his promotion of his his own sinister causes. His speech is often garbled and illogical. If he were so sharp, he'd never have been exposed with the gay escort service running out of his Washington apartment.