Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California considering banning giant TVs
www.telegraph.co.uk ^

Posted on 10/16/2009 1:05:47 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Sub-Driver

Well then. I am happy we got our 60 inch plasma and ensuing 42 inch, and 35 inch for the other rooms then. :-D.


41 posted on 10/16/2009 2:04:51 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldteen

Exactly - it’s not the state’s soaring energy bill, it’s a total of the bills of people living in the state, paid for by the people. Ugh.


42 posted on 10/16/2009 2:08:17 PM PDT by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And the real point?

Disconnect people.


43 posted on 10/16/2009 2:10:18 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

The uptick in AZ, NV and Oregon HDTV sales will be shortlived, however, as California implements border control checkpoints next to agricultural station checkpoints. You will either be turned back at the border or have your TV confiscated.

Drug smugglers will begin having their mules bring large screen TVs.

Before the full-scale ban, they might first try out rationed TV allotments. Each household is permitted to buy one TV larger than 40 inches every decade. This will be the “public option.”


44 posted on 10/16/2009 2:15:55 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: albie
“Their constituents all have 50 inch and bigger! Mostly paid for with gov money (hand-outs) They’re messin’ with their base now.”

Well, we also pay for their housing, their power, their food, and in most cases, their booze and drugs. Why should they be upset? Think they would care about a ban they wouldn't follow in the first place?

45 posted on 10/16/2009 2:25:30 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
I’m sure this is just for the masses - do you actually think Pelosi or gollywood is going to go without?

Hardly. Spoiled-brat liberals can't see beyond their own noses. They think everyone else needs to do the sacrificing, not them.

46 posted on 10/16/2009 2:32:17 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

pSSST....hey buddy wanna but a 52 incher ???


47 posted on 10/16/2009 2:59:51 PM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

TV’s account for 10% of home energy use?
What about the other 90%?
I assume that’s next.....

Look for college cube refrigerators to be a hot seller in CA soon....


48 posted on 10/16/2009 3:10:26 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Life, Liberty and the Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
California considering banning giant TVs Electricity-guzzling giant-screen televisions are on the verge of being banned in California in an attempt to cut the state's soaring energy bill.

Not sure what this means. How would a ban reduce the state's energy bill?

49 posted on 10/16/2009 5:32:23 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
What's next? King-size deluxe washing machines? Jumbo refrigerators? Dishwashers with potscrubber modes? Why not just wait for the economy to drive the illegals back across the border, and watch the state's electricity consumption go back down. Water, too.

-PJ

50 posted on 10/16/2009 5:38:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Comprehensive congressional reform legislation only yields incomprehensible bills that nobody reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldteen
This would save me $2.50 per month on my energy bill? Well, I’d rather pay that $2.50 to have a screen I can actually see with these old eyes!

You may be on to something there - a new source of tax revenue. A "Telly Tax" similar to the UK, only this would relate to "saving the planet". That way the elites can have their big TVs and still feel good about it.

51 posted on 10/17/2009 7:24:48 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson