Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pray4liberty

Um, you didn’t read my very next comment, did you? LOL

PS If the statute just punshed “harm by posting,” with harm not defined, it would be unconstitutional. Sorry, I’m allowed to “harm” people’s feeling with my speech. For that matter, I’m allowed to harm their reputation - if what I say is true - and even harm their livelihood and life - again if what I say is true. As an extreme example, if I know someone is about to commit a heinous crime, I’m allowed to warn people about it even if that ultimately results in the person getting killed (for example by the cops). Any law to the contrary would be unconstitutional.


57 posted on 10/16/2009 11:59:40 AM PDT by piytar (This tag deleted by the Ministry of Truth. Remember, Big Brother Loves You. Or else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: piytar
Um, you didn’t read my very next comment, did you? LOL

Which one? I think I answered before I saw that post.

61 posted on 10/16/2009 12:02:55 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson