Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WallStreetCapitalist
My experience with twenty somethings has been exactly the opposite. One guy's sense of entitlement, resistance to accept criticism, dimisiveiness of those with more experience, lack of basic skills that I carried into the workplace after college thirty years ago, coupled with a manipulative propensity to undermine those over them, made him worse than useless.
68 posted on 10/16/2009 2:11:45 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
That's why I said those things are generally true and that there are always exceptions. The truth is, regardless of family upbringing, socioeconomic status, education, or religious affiliation, some people are just losers. I know it's not popular or politically correct to say that. The sense of entitlement, in my experience, comes from those who were born into situations where their parents provided them everything they wanted - from cell phones to iPods to cars.

On a personal level, one of the greatest gifts God gave me were my parents. My father's parting words to me when he dropped me off at college were: "You are now responsible for making your dreams come true." The message was clear: Anything I wanted in life, from the moment they drove away, I had to earn on my own. Some of my friends thought it was cold, yet it was liberating, exciting - and, yes, scary. I knew that he had just handed the keys over to me, so to speak, and I wanted to make him proud. Even today, I sometimes say it aloud to myself when we are working on launching a new business or taking a risk in one field or another.

When people behave as you described, they are often unable to stay in one place for long. This includes employment, friendships, and family relationships. Although far from perfect, it's nearly impossible to fool everyone all of the time. In the end, he'll usually end up getting what he deserves.

Another possibility is the idea of where in an economic system one's skills reside. Typically, by the time I see a man or woman, they've had to acquire some pretty impressive skills, either in graphic art, coding, or finance (almost everything else, we can teach). Someone who has a sense of entitlement probably didn't make it through that far so I'm not sure I get to see this side of my age group because of the natural filtration that exists in my industry. It also helps that our business model allows us to work only with people I like, admire, and trust. In other words, if I were operating a call center business, I'm sure I'd have plenty of experiences dealing with the type of person you described because the "barriers to entry", in economic parlance, are relatively low. It's also possible that whoever did the hiring at your firm was just a dumb*ss, if you'll pardon my candor. That's why I love pay for performance models. People should be judged solely on what they accomplish - not on what they know, what their resume looks like, or who they've worked for in the past. Rockefeller was a clerk at a commodities firm in Ohio. Carnegie worked as a telegraph operator. Their resumes were not impressive until later in life, when their accomplishments made them stand out from the crowd.

74 posted on 10/16/2009 3:27:33 PM PDT by WallStreetCapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson