Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBO Says Climate Bill Will Hurt Not Help Economy
The American Thinker ^ | October 14, 2009 | Marc Sheppard

Posted on 10/15/2009 4:58:31 AM PDT by Scanian

Today, the director of the Congressional Budget Office warned the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that proposed climate change legislation would impose "significant costs" on America's GDP and employment. That’s not exactly what proponents had promised.

According to CBO chief Douglas Elmendorf, the Waxman-Markey bill passed in the House last June would reduce GDP by between one and three quarters of a percent by 2020, and between 1 and 3.5% by 2050. To the average household that might equate annually to $160 by 2020 and $925 by 2050 – hardly the “cost of a postage stamp” promised by the White House.

And the CBO director admitted the obvious -- that even those figures, which represent just a fraction of many economists’ predictions, are likely somewhat understated:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: captax; climatechange; gdp; waxmanmalarkey

1 posted on 10/15/2009 4:58:32 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian
$160 by 2020 and $925 by 2050 – hardly the “cost of a postage stamp” promised by the White House.

Could be... where does the Post Office Czar want to take postage stamps, price-wise?

2 posted on 10/15/2009 5:01:18 AM PDT by C210N (A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Is this another “No crap Sherlock aka Captain Obvious” thread?


3 posted on 10/15/2009 5:03:00 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Duhhhhh! YA Think!!


4 posted on 10/15/2009 5:06:09 AM PDT by timetostand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Let’s see...the “energy bill” will make it economically impossible for the development or construction of new power plants, disallow new oil drilling, natural gas facilities, and coal mining, and it won’t authorize any new nuclear power plants.
It pretends to promote solar and wind energy, but won’t allow a large, very efficient 500 Mw solar facility in the Mojave desert, or a Wind farm off the MA coast.

So it is a very expensive bill which produces NO ENERGY, KILLS JOBS, and DESTROYS AMERICAN INDUSTRY and ALL OF THE ASSOCIATED TAX REVENUE.....Tell me again why this is called an “enrgy bill”????


5 posted on 10/15/2009 5:15:11 AM PDT by G Larry ( Obamacare=Dying in Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I don’t trust the CBO much anymore. Remember when the Healthcare bill was going to cost trillions? Then, after going to the White House, the CBO announced the healthcare bill would actually save money.


6 posted on 10/15/2009 5:17:29 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

ever get the feeling that the collective braintrust at the CBO is going to wake up one of these mornings and find themselves in a FEMA camp?


7 posted on 10/15/2009 6:17:50 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson