No, I didn't miss it. I just think that he's paid for his crime and is not a good example in this case. Rush is not being punished for some crime, he is being punished for being a conservative and anti obumber. By that standard, any owner that is liberal and anti Palin should not be allowed to own a team.
Sorry, but you miss the point yet again.
The NFL must ‘protect its brand’ from such as Rush even as they welcome dog torturers into the fold.
Yes Vick paid his time. But he is a far, far worse icon in the NFL than Rush might ever, ever be ....
You focus on legalisms. I refer to ethics & moral scruple.