>> This Shooting was Totally Justifiable. A: Of course it was - ref. Florida Statutes 776.012/.013/.032 et. al.
>> Any Questions? Yes - Why do you (and too many others here) insist on encouraging Freepers (who live in every state in the Union, with widely varying laws) to be satisfied with the anecdotal "If those bastiges come in my house they're dead!" knowledge of the law?
Freepers, you MUST know the laws of your state, and the (usually differing) laws of every state in which you could ever use a gun. Go to handgunlaw.us for a start, then to your state's statutes.
In your Post you Allege that it was only an Issue of Property.
>> “The way I look at it is like they invade my privacy and I was scared when I come in, so I defended, you know, my property,” he said.
>>”Word to the wise: You cannot take someone’s life for messing with one’s toys.
YOU CAN, however, if in fear of loss of your life or limb, defend yourself using up to and including deadly force.”
Because You only Quoted the line concerning Property.
That was Not the Case. So, Why Flog everyone about Property.
You did not go to the Link and use the appropriate Quote that reflected the facts.
So, It looks like you have some particular Axe to grind.
Why, do you own a Firearms Training School?
Yes, it is incumbent upon all who use weapons to know the Law in their State or Municipality.
Other than Chicago or New York, Where is it Not OK to defend yourself against an Armed Intruder?
Not too many places.
Excellent post.
Know the laws!