Replies

So you’re saying that people such as that traitor {one giving aid and comfort to the enemy} John Murtha SHOULDN’T be shot?

You’re saying a congress, namely the 111th, that proposes (and passes) a law which targets a certain group of people (bailout-recipient CEOs) for a retroactive (ex post facto) and punitive taxation is upholding and defending the Supreme Law of The Land (The Constitution)? (That says nothing of Amendments 4,5,6,7, & 14.)

My list/count of Constitutional infractions over JUST the retroactive & punitive AIG taxation:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dv698tm_22dr6x3nfb

And you’re calling me over the top?
*shrug* - I don’t know about you, but I don’t think that swearing to protect and defend the Constitution can be used to justify inaction here. Either the Constitution IS the supreme law of the land, or it is not... there is NO middle-ground in the logic.

If it IS the supreme law of the land, then we have a leadership full of law-breakers who happen to be in charge of the prosecution and (I’m assuming) you want me to believe that they’ll allow this to be prosecuted? That’s just naive.