Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: parsifal
Parsy, are you at it again, finding articles written by ignorant people and posting them, as long as they are anti-Wall Street?

In addition, as I had a chance to tell you earlier, "regulating Wall Street" is a religion: you believe that such regulation exists. It does not. To regulate, one has to have information about the objects being regulated (firms, products, consumers, etc.) Governments ALWAYS know less than the actors in the economy. There is no regulation that would be able to prevent cycles. And, in fact, it was regulation that turned a regular recession of 1929 into a prolonged Depression.

So you are acting out a religious belief, parsy, and rely on absolutely empty articles such as this one to support it.

8 posted on 10/14/2009 9:54:36 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TopQuark

This “cycle’ didn’t just happen. Did I ever send you the crashopedia link?

It wasn’t just bind happenstance that kept most derivatives from going on exchanges. It wasn’t just a stroke of bad luck that got Glass-Steagall replaced.

parsy, who wonders what you thought about the details in the article


10 posted on 10/14/2009 10:04:58 AM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson