They held the "hearings" prior to the elction, which, as I explained in great detail yesterday, is the general procedure under the election laws in just about every state for contesting the qualifications of candidates to appear on the ballot. IIRC, the RAT's commenced an action in the State of Texas to contest McLame's qualifications to appear on the ballot in that state and they lost. If McLame and his shills at the GOP has any balls, they would have challenged 0bama's qualifications BEFORE THE ELECTION. Having failed to do so, the time to commence an action to contest a candidtate's qualifications has expired. In addition, once the election is complete and certified the controversey is no-longer justiciable, and the only remedy is political (i.e., impeachment) until the next election cycle.
Rather than wasting our time on the post-election birther lawsuits and a lawyer name Orily who, in my opinion, does not have a clue, we ought to be focusing upon legal challenges to 0bama's qualifications as his name is placed on the ballot in each state PRIOR to the 2012 election. In addition, we ought to be lobbying the legislature in a few key Red states to change the state's election law to expressly require a candidate for POTUS to provide a copy of the original (or a certified copy) of the his or her birth certificate as a precondition to placing their name on the ballot.
There were actions questioning Obama’s eligibility before the election. Berg tried to point out the issues and the constitutional crisis if someone who was ineligible was actually elected.
Donofrio and others tried to get SCOTUS to review the issue before the inauguration.
But there is Quo Warrento writs to file for someone who is in office and is ineligible.
But it is not clear that a civil case can not be brought by candidates for the President that the winner was not eligible to run. That can not throw him out. But can serve to force discovery that upon getting proof would be brought in a Quo Warrento action.
If it is proven that Obama is ineligible by not being a Natural Born Citizen then he is not a legitimate President and can be removed.
But I certainly applaud all actions to make it very clear that proof of being a Natural born citizen is required for anyone to run for President or Vice President in the future.
With all “due” respect....
this country won’t last until the 2012 election. At least, not at the current speed at which the country is being dismantled, destroyed and decimated.
And again, why the double standard in release of records? Why did Zero seal his records? What is Zero hiding? Other than his intentional and deliberate BLATANT destruction of the USA, what ELSE is Zero up to?
If I, as a citizen of the United States, do not have standing or a right to know the answers to any of those questions, then this country is doomed and the constitution IS just a worthless piece of paper.
I don’t happen to believe that.
So no. I disagree with you and I’m ready to do whatever is necessary and whatever possible to remedy this intolerable situation we’re now in.
And I’m not alone.