To: thulldud
Anyone who uses Wiki as a source is automatically lame.
83 posted on
10/13/2009 3:55:17 PM PDT by
rintense
(Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
To: rintense
That's just it. Wikipedia is NOT a source of anything, in the first place. But more than that, its very design makes it unusable in citations. What good is a citation if the reference that it points to is not stable?
Wikipedia is a source of amusement, nothing more. You want a source citation, you can get the Encyclopedia Britannica online.
86 posted on
10/13/2009 4:05:02 PM PDT by
thulldud
(It HAS happened here!)
To: rintense
My daughter is in third grade, and one of the conditions of her writing reports, etc. is that students CANNOT use wiki as a source!!! Elementary, my dear Watson, and yet these doofuses in the MSM treat it as if it were canon!! LOL! Boy, are their collective faces going to be red when they get slapped with multiple lawsuits!
And Rush has the bucks to drag this out for years—do they?
100 posted on
10/13/2009 6:49:20 PM PDT by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson