Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: refreshed

I read the order to she if she was being sanctioned merely for challenging Nilbama’s credentials. She was not. She was sanctioned for being a nut—and it’s okay to be a nut, you just can’t use a law license to impose your nuttiness on the legal system.

Among other things, she moved to have the judge recused because he owned stock in Microsoft, she pursued the case after it was moot (the reservist’s orders to go to Afghanistan were withdrawn), she held news conferences to call the judge names, she accused the judge of ethical misconduct without any proof. It did kind of “border on delusional”.


20 posted on 10/13/2009 11:18:31 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: San Jacinto

Her telling the judge to “shove it” isn’t going to help her get an appeals hearing.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/birther_orly_taitz_responds_to_judges_20k_fine_sho.php?ref=mp


21 posted on 10/13/2009 11:20:00 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: San Jacinto

It wasnt her cause that got her in trouble, it was her conduct. She has a mail order law degree, very little courtroom experience, continually made mistakes in her motions and she attacked the integrity of the judge. That is a sure fire recipe for disaster. She does not need to be the point person for this agenda.


32 posted on 10/13/2009 12:12:43 PM PDT by mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson