The judge took time out of a busy schedule to arrange a special hearing for her. He produced a lucid opinion detailing via case law and precedent why the case she filed wasn't viable. The bases he cited for that conclusion are not new or controversial in the legal profession.
Judges declaring cases nonviable will often say things the proponents of that case find harsh. Tough luck. You should have filed a better case. As this same thing had happened before, he specifically told her not to do it again, as is the court's prerogative. Courts have pretty full dockets, and they don't have time to waste with rehearing the same case over and over again.
At that point, Orly acted like an aggrieved child instead of a lawyer. She filed a ludicrous brief whose obvious intention was to salve her wounded pride, filled with language so intemperate no lawyer would expect anything other than a sanction. Which is what happened.
I hear you sir, and will only point out, that the Judge was in error in the interpleadings where he said that she first dropped the officer, then refiled recklessly. In fact, she responsibly filed for the remaining clients she was trying to protect. She covered this on her website.
I agree that she is alot over the top, but I really think this judge wanted to shut her up, for the purposes of NOT hearing this case on its merits...
Anyway...she is never boring...that’sa for sho...