“She has legitimate claims, questions, and evidence.”
Claims and questions are not evidence. As I understand it, she has no “evidence” which is why she is in court. She wants a judge to allow her access to “evidence”. Yes?
She has a lot of circumstantial evidence, which is what brought this to court in the first place. Achieving approval for discovery, allows that circumstantial evidence to be proven, or disproven. Getting over the hump to have the court allow discovery, any court, is the problem, none thus far have allowed discovery, and use “standing” as a reason to deny discovery. Hearing the case on its merits is the first step to allowing discovery.
In this case, the judge, in his 44 page summary judgement, has not heard the merits of this case, and summarily rejects it, based on newspaper articles, web page blogs, and heresay. It is quite telling when Taitz says the judge is biased, and he summarily rejects her contention, then goes on to site these examples.
One can clearly understand her exasperation with this judge. Also, she was approached by an individual who states in an affidavit that Eric Holder was in the area, prior to the summation of her case with this judge. The judge did not talk to this person, and held Taitz responsible for even filing the question to the judge, and punishes her for the submission.
It is clear that Taitz borders on Hysterics, but that in itself does not make her case invalid, what does is the judge dismissing it, and fining her without even hearing it, which in my opinion is designed to quash the proceedings, her reputation, and perhaps to set her up to be disbarred.
All of this dances arount the fact that he would not hear the case on its merits, but dismisses them out of hand. Which makes on wonder, why he is working so hard NOT to hear the case and be done with it. It appears that he wants no connection to it.
There is more going on here IMO than meets the eye.