Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

I defy the Taitz supporters to actually read the order and continue their support.

She is a complete whack job, and richly deserves the sanction.


91 posted on 10/13/2009 8:43:30 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckhead
"The Court found that Plaintiff had failed to satisfy any of the elements necessary for a federal court to interfere with a deployment order issued by the U.S. Army. The Court further found the action to be legally frivolous, meaning that no reasonable attorney could have expected that her legal claim would prevail under existing law or under a reasonable extension or modification of existing law. The claims were based solely on conjecture and speculation that the President may not have been born in the United States."

Just what all us supposed "trolls" have been saying all along. You don't go to court with speculation.

103 posted on 10/13/2009 8:49:49 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Buckhead

For a long time I have been reading her comments about cases, judges, outcomes of rulings, whatever; all I could think then was that she was on very thin ice ethically in regards to decorum. I darned near got a lawyer sanctioned for his behavior - got him to stop representing his client (my ex) because of his shenanigans and the likelihood that he would get sanctioned if he continued representing her in such fashion. My lawyer congratulated me on my efforts because he stated it was a direct result of my tenacity with the board of ethics that got him to back down. They (the board) was telling this idiot that he was on thin ice - I knew it from the beginning. The rules for decorum are very strict indeed - almost impossible not to run afoul of when you let emotions rule you, which I think Orly tends to do.

I know very little about the law other than family law in MN, most of that I have blissfully forgotten now, but the ethics boards lay things out pretty straight (just about any reasonable person should be able to understand them).

I don’t really need to read the order for myself to get the gist of it. Orly screwed up by using hyperbole and got herself in this mess. The best thing she could’ve done is be quiet about her feelings publicly, but she had to “feed the masses” some red meat.

Don’t get me wrong, I think there are issues with Obama’s eligibility, but I remain realistic about it. I expect there is somewhere between diddly and squat that anyone can do about it short of impeachment hearings.


155 posted on 10/13/2009 9:36:02 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (America, do not commit Barry Care-y!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Buckhead; BuckeyeTexan
Ooohhhh....

How long until someone calls Buckhead a troll?

Taking bets.

236 posted on 10/13/2009 10:19:18 AM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Buckhead

I support anyone who is pursuing Obama’s records. He’s a marxist and quite possibly, not an NBC.


245 posted on 10/13/2009 10:24:18 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson