Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
He advanced this theory well before the “born in Kenya” mess became popular theory.

No, he didn't.

Leo Donofrio jumped onboard the birther bandwagon right at the end of October 2008, when he filed Donofrio v Wells. The "born in Kenya mess" was introduced in March 2008 to no interest, finally caught the web's attention in June 2008, and got widespread attention with Phil Berg's complaint in August 2008.

So the Kenyan-birth eligibility accusations had been circulating for at least four months before Donofrio started advancing any alternative theories as to Obama's ineligibility.

635 posted on 10/13/2009 2:47:15 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]


To: LorenC

You’re correct. That’s when he filed his suit. Regardless, Donofrio doesn’t like to be associated with birthers. He doesn’t want on their bandwagon. Birthers would have the law twisted and broken just to remove Obama from office.

While I believe that Obama isn’t eligible based on his dual citizenship status at birth, I would accept and support a ruling from the SCOTUS that declared him eligible. I respect the law, even when it doesn’t suit my personal agenda.


651 posted on 10/13/2009 2:57:55 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson