Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Well Judge Land has also sent the order to the California State Bar.


63 posted on 10/13/2009 8:23:35 AM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: MilspecRob

She’s going to be disbarred, it’s only a matter of time.


65 posted on 10/13/2009 8:24:56 AM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: MilspecRob; All

If anyone’s interested in reading this more than 40 page decision, there is discussion on pp25-28 that this judge believes that the proper forum for outing a POTUS who fraudulently concealed his qualifications to be POTUS is in impeachent proceedings.

I despise Obama and his policies, and believe he has fraudulently concealed his past, but it is a bit difficult to disagree with the substance of this court’s sanctions order, if she engaged in all the behavior he detailed in his decision.

And btw for those who haven’t read the decision and order, he expressly denied being in a coffee shop with Holder, and denied ever speaking or meeting with him.

He was also quite displeased at her specuation that that he had a financial interest in the outcome because he owned stock in Comcast and Microsoft, and she claimed the profits of those companies would suffer if Obama was removed.

You have to be careful about accusing a judge - especially a federal court judge- of illicit and “treasonous” conduct. He obviously took offense to her “fictitious” allegations.

Next case!


74 posted on 10/13/2009 8:32:50 AM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson