Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot

And only two of those documents might have any bearing on his Constitutional qualifications for the presidency. He’s submitted one, and the fact that you call it a forgery is irrelevant. Others say it’s genuine.


577 posted on 10/13/2009 1:51:20 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Who says it’s genuine? The marxists at Factcheck don’t get to vet the candidates now, do they?


580 posted on 10/13/2009 1:53:56 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
Others say it’s genuine.

Especially you and your groupies, and your opinion amounts to squat.

The fact remains we know less about this man than any other man in History, except maybe the Unknown Soldiers buried around the world.

Strangely Court sealed records of his opponents for office, all found their way into the media, despite being sealed.

Obama's stuff, however, remains sealed, guess he had better lawyers, or just maybe a few crooked judges, helped him out, like the ones that are aiding and abetting him now.

1,151 posted on 10/15/2009 9:41:34 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson