Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmost
I have absolutely no idea how you can connect the internal destructive economic policies with Afghanistan.

In a sense, they're "the same" in the sense that there's no good solution, only bad ones to choose from. To choose any of them will create very difficult new problems.

The puzzle is to find the least bad solution in each case; and to be honest, the cost of waging the WOT is a significant contributor to the deficit, so you can't just say they're separate issues.

Pulling out of the WOT would be a bad thing, of course -- I don't think we can do so without seriously strengthening the hands of the Islamofascists. And we can't forget that those folks live in places that produce a lot of oil: to let them back up would probably give them influence over oil supplies in one way or another, which has its own dire economic consequences.

I don't know that there's any pleasant way out of this mess....

53 posted on 10/13/2009 6:21:18 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
The option aren't good. Afghanistan was forced on us on by the Taliban shielding al qaeda after 9/11. The monetary cost of the WOT is relatively small with regards to the current economic mess we're in though. The fiscally unmanageable issues are ideological and systemic.
54 posted on 10/13/2009 6:29:34 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson