Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfcreek
I don't think the CIA or whoever doing a background check on potential elected officials qualifies as believing in *conspiracies*.

You are saying that you think that the CIA or whoever is violating the law and conducting illegal background checks on political candidates without a single shred of evidence to support it. If that isn't a conspiracy theory then what is it?

Those DoD umbrella units are bound by the Constitution to do what they can to protect this country and it's populous.

Saying they're a bunch of inept buffoons, who don't have a clue, is a bit treasonous in itself.

To say that they are deliberately violating the law without a big of evidence to support it drifts into tin-foil beanie territory. They are also bound by law as to what they can do and what they can't.

49 posted on 10/13/2009 4:11:55 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

“You are saying that you think that the CIA or whoever is violating the law and conducting illegal background”

Hell no. I want them (or someone) to check backgrounds of candidates. (especially Manchurian ones)

I don’t know (nor do I think you do) if that’s one of their functions but, it should be.

“Those DoD umbrella units are bound by the Constitution to do what they can to protect this country and it’s populous.”

Don’t be trying to turn my words around.


50 posted on 10/13/2009 4:19:06 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson