Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters
In a legal sense, these cases remind me of the 1960s-1990s Tobacco Litigation. Every plaintiff lost.... until one won.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers kept going, because they knew that eventually, the dam would break. And when it did, all the plaintiffs began to win.

4 posted on 10/12/2009 1:05:20 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never kick leftists when they're down. Wait till they're half way back up. You get better leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26

The judge in this case filed by Mario Apuzzo has just been sitting on the case for almost a year.

The judiciary si so corrupt in this country along with the executive and legislative branches.


5 posted on 10/12/2009 1:07:33 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Good analogy and metaphor: “the dam would break.” But the dam breaking in these presidential cases would be a big step toward maintaining a constitutional republic in the US. By contrast, the broken dam in the tobacco cases had more of negative effect on the legal system than a positive one.


14 posted on 10/12/2009 1:25:48 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson