Skip to comments.
Plaintiff : Courts must hear eligibility arguments
WorldNetDaily ^
| October 12, 2009
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 10/12/2009 1:00:23 PM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; Altera; ...
To: RobinMasters
A plaintiff on one of the cases challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says federal courts must hear the challenges Gee, isn't that a shocker. A plaintiff wants doesn't want his case dismissed.
In other news, prosecutors want grand juries to indict their defendants, and football coaches want the calls they challange to be overturned.
3
posted on
10/12/2009 1:03:59 PM PDT
by
curiosity
To: RobinMasters
In a legal sense, these cases remind me of the 1960s-1990s Tobacco Litigation. Every plaintiff lost.... until one won.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers kept going, because they knew that eventually, the dam would break. And when it did, all the plaintiffs began to win.
4
posted on
10/12/2009 1:05:20 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Never kick leftists when they're down. Wait till they're half way back up. You get better leverage!)
To: MindBender26
The judge in this case filed by Mario Apuzzo has just been sitting on the case for almost a year.
The judiciary si so corrupt in this country along with the executive and legislative branches.
5
posted on
10/12/2009 1:07:33 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
To: LucyT
PING before the Obama supporters crawl from under their rocks and take over the thread.
6
posted on
10/12/2009 1:12:12 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
To: RobinMasters; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ..
7
posted on
10/12/2009 1:12:55 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 263 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: RobinMasters
“former Vice President Dick Cheney”
You'd think Mr.Cheney would want a piece of Barry. Especially with a looming investigation into the *Plame* incident.
8
posted on
10/12/2009 1:14:34 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: stockpirate; All
They have already emerged in the first few replies!
9
posted on
10/12/2009 1:19:06 PM PDT
by
FARS
(Be happy, Be well and Thrive)
To: wolfcreek
re: looming investigation into the *Plame* incident
I would think they would reopen that Pandora's box with great care. There was much more wrong done there that right, and an honest inquiry into the whole mess would reveal a lot of problems. Of course, the operative word here is ‘honest’ and I'm afraid anyone this bunch would appoint would have the sole aim of bring more discredit to the Bush administration.
You will NEVER, EVER convince me that whole thing wasn't a setup by the CIA from start to finish. There's simply no other way to explain everything that happened there.
10
posted on
10/12/2009 1:19:50 PM PDT
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America, and wake us up while you're about it!)
To: curiosity
And freerepublic wants posters to actually post posts.
11
posted on
10/12/2009 1:20:03 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
To: FARS
This is great news, soon the dam will break and this case will move forward and the truth will come out about our communist usurper in chief, Barkist Obamacon.
Soon the Obamanoids will be here.
12
posted on
10/12/2009 1:23:12 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
To: stockpirate
How dare you, sir! Stop picking on our Kenyan messiah!!!!
13
posted on
10/12/2009 1:24:41 PM PDT
by
newfreep
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: MindBender26
Good analogy and metaphor: “the dam would break.” But the dam breaking in these presidential cases would be a big step toward maintaining a constitutional republic in the US. By contrast, the broken dam in the tobacco cases had more of negative effect on the legal system than a positive one.
To: jwparkerjr
Hell, the CIA might even be involved in Barry’s eligibility coverup. There’s NO WAY they didn’t FULLY vet him.
15
posted on
10/12/2009 1:32:14 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: wolfcreek
Man, that would be something but it does not make sense that bam would be harassing them while knowing they know he’s not a NBC!
To: wolfcreek
I would think that the people behind the Obama cover up have spent quite a bit of time and money getting people into positions in every nook and cranny of that might have a bearing on the plot. Discrediting the Bush administration was a vital part of getting Obama into office. Sadly, Bush made it much easier by being so unwilling to protect his flank and defend his territory. My guess is the people behind Obama could hardly believe their luck when it turned out Bush would try to co-opt the liberal issues and actually work with people like Ted Kennedy to implement some of the Left’s pet projects. Add to that the Republican leadership turning into nothing less than Democrat-lite when it came to increasing government and spending. Talk about the perfect storm! I know George Bush got a lot of things right, and accomplished quite a bit for someone who was under constant attack, but for every one of those things a couple of others were ticked off by the opposition.
Whoever is behind Obama has orchestrated a plot that takes into consideration every aspect of how we govern ourselves. But in the end they depended on the fact that everyone has their price. For some it's money, others it's recognition, others it's control. They studied the price of a lot of differing aspects and set about appealing to each one of them. The result is what we see today. A government and economy about to collapse under its own weight and several dozen czars in place to direct every aspect of our lives. Take overs of all sorts of private enterprises, and now health care.
We are seeing the end game of a lot of planning.
17
posted on
10/12/2009 1:45:58 PM PDT
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America, and wake us up while you're about it!)
To: RobinMasters
A plaintiff on one of the cases challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says federal courts must hear the challenges, because to do otherwise would be treason Well that's really going to sway the judge. </sarcasm>
To: SaraJohnson
This too could be bogus.
We are being lied to and manipulated on a daily basis.
19
posted on
10/12/2009 1:50:36 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: jwparkerjr
20
posted on
10/12/2009 1:55:57 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson