To: Balding_Eagle; raybbr
"
As the rest of us can recall, the tax cuts barely passed as they are, the permanant tax cut was a goal that was left unachieved." A permanent tax cut would require a constitutional ammendment. What chance would that have?
148 posted on
10/12/2009 9:24:17 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: editor-surveyor
A permanent tax cut would require a constitutional ammendment. What chance would that have?Huh? An Amendment? How is it that Congress can raise taxes and how is it that under Reagan taxes were reduced from 90% to about 30%? I don't recall an Amendment then.
152 posted on
10/12/2009 10:42:54 AM PDT by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson