1 posted on
10/11/2009 11:34:52 AM PDT by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: kristinn
In Obama’s case, the medium is the message.
2 posted on
10/11/2009 11:38:33 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians BS.)
To: kristinn
This, sadly, seems about as much as can be hoped for right now from Establishment Democratic Politicians.
To: kristinn
Yo, Bobby, the whole point of the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize was that Obama is the Anti-Bush, you silly man.
4 posted on
10/11/2009 11:47:24 AM PDT by
Chgogal
(American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
To: kristinn
Obama:
This is not the Bob Kerrey I used to know. The former senator actually makes alot of sense here. I'm shocked.
5 posted on
10/11/2009 11:48:00 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Go rogue baby, go rogue!)
To: kristinn
John Kerry medal of honor, now that is the most that I have been insulted. John Kerry says that he served in Viet Nam but there is no proof. John Kerry accused all Viet Nam Veterans of killing babes and war crimes was bad but to say that he got a medal of honor is an insult!
6 posted on
10/11/2009 11:48:03 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: kristinn
One “tiny” problem for Obama — or rather for the USA. He’s an Ayers Radical and as such views the US military as the cause of world-wide bloody US imperialism. He’s going to cut-n-run.
7 posted on
10/11/2009 11:48:19 AM PDT by
avacado
To: kristinn
He can’t the Nobel people put him in a box. LOL. Foolish communists in Norway have sealed his demise.
8 posted on
10/11/2009 11:49:00 AM PDT by
riri
(http://rationaljingo.blogspot.com/)
To: kristinn
John Kerry, eh?
I heard he served in Viet Nam...
9 posted on
10/11/2009 11:49:18 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: kristinn
Bob Kerrey? Never woulda thought!
11 posted on
10/11/2009 11:52:15 AM PDT by
Joann37
To: kristinn
Bob Kerrey’s criticism of Obama will surely be reported extensively by the enemedia. NOT!
12 posted on
10/11/2009 11:55:29 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: kristinn
14 posted on
10/11/2009 11:58:10 AM PDT by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: kristinn
'Naive' Obama
It's because he's a light-brownish color, isn't it. That's racist.
16 posted on
10/11/2009 12:06:14 PM PDT by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: kristinn
>>> This war is not Vietnam. The Taliban are not popular and have very little support other than what they secure through terror. <<<
Am I to suppose that the Vietcong WERE popular and had lots of support in South Vietnam and Cambodia, aside from what they secured through terror?
This doesn’t accord with the history I’ve read, especially for the period of time after Tet.
To: kristinn
In December 2006, President George W. Bush was faced with a similarly difficult foreign policy decision. The Republicans had suffered tremendous losses in the November election, in part because of the conduct of the war in Iraq. At the time, the unpopular Republican president was being pressured by ascendant congressional Democrats and some members of his own party into withdrawing from Iraq. Failure in Iraq loomed, as public opinion for the effort to help the democratically elected government survive had faded thanks to a series of tactical blunders and inaccurate assessments of what would be needed to accomplish the mission. Then, against all reasonable predictions, President Bush chose to increase rather than decrease our military commitment. The "surge," as it became known, worked. Victory was snatched from the jaws of defeat.
Actually, the surge was decided on and planned for before the November election. One of the principle reasons for the "tremendous losses" was that almost no Republicans in Congress defended the need for the war in Iraq, nor stood with the President in calling for a victory there. Our troops were abandoned by almost everyone except President Bush.
But other than that error, GOOD for Kerrey for telling the truth about Obama and his naive apologetic, (anti-American) pseudo-foreign policy.
19 posted on
10/11/2009 12:15:49 PM PDT by
ohioWfan
(Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
To: kristinn
21 posted on
10/11/2009 12:29:28 PM PDT by
rdl6989
To: kristinn
How dare he attempt to advise a Nobel Prize winner...
22 posted on
10/11/2009 12:30:22 PM PDT by
El Sordo
To: kristinn
And if I weren't a supporter, my judgment would be harsher.
Sounds borderline racist to me.
24 posted on
10/11/2009 12:33:36 PM PDT by
Canedawg
(FUBO)
To: kristinn
Knock me over with a feather.
Evidently Bob Kerry didn’t get the memo - you don’t advise the One on military matters....or on any matter......unless it fits in with the Obomunist Agenda....and this advice doesn’t. He’ll learn soon enough.
25 posted on
10/11/2009 12:35:56 PM PDT by
Freedom'sWorthIt
(Obama's Deathcare ---- many will suffer and/or die unnecessarily.)
To: kristinn
If anyone recalls, Bob Kerrey was the one who called Clinton "an unusually good liar."
I guess he can call them at times.
27 posted on
10/11/2009 12:49:01 PM PDT by
truthkeeper
("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
To: kristinn
I am going to copy /paste this article to every lib I can find
28 posted on
10/11/2009 12:52:17 PM PDT by
reefdiver
(So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson