Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Susan Daniels signed affadavit confirming Obama used deceased man's SS#
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20509291/KEYES-v-OBAMA-78-4-Exhibit-Affidavit-PI-Susan-Daniels-Obama-s-use-of-SS-number-of-the-deceased-Taitz-Orly-Entered-10-01-2009-Gov-uscourts ^

Posted on 10/11/2009 10:02:29 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-253 next last
To: BluH2o
Most kids have a SS# assigned to them in their early to mid-teens, when they first start looking for part time work.

Not anymore. They now get them at birth, because you can't claim a dependent w/o a SSN for them. This became a requirement for returns filed in 1987, but many folks got them at birth earlier than that.

I think they may have been required for college entrance as well, I know my college ID number was my SSN, and I started in 1968. (so is my military ID#, but "O" doesn't have one of those). So if he needed one for Occidental, he'd have gotten it in about 1979, but if he entered Occidental as a Foreign student, he would not have needed an SSN, there were alternatives for them, IIRC.

121 posted on 10/11/2009 12:39:58 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I have had this feeling that someone is going to stumble across some evidence, such as this, seemingly of insignificance value which was overlooked by the Obama administration and this small and unassuming evidence will lead to revealing the complete truth not only on the legitimacy of Obama’s citizenship but will lead to uncovering startling and incriminating evidence of a premeditated crime engulfing top level Democrats such as Pelosi, Reid, Biden and the Clintons!


122 posted on 10/11/2009 12:41:03 PM PDT by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Isn’t that what the signed statement says? How could the SS have been used in 1890?


123 posted on 10/11/2009 12:41:12 PM PDT by listenhillary (A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sten

Yep, you are correct....but everybody got one at some point. I have a copy of my Great-Grandmother’s Application for Social Security Account. It was dated Feb 1952. She was 76 years old. I believe the SSA made rounds to business to sign people up, because my Grandfather’s SS# is just a few digits off of my Great-Grandmothers. They had a family business and SSA must have finally come in one day and signed everybody up. I mean really, how many years did it take for the SSA to get everybody signed up.....1936 to 1952?


124 posted on 10/11/2009 12:42:02 PM PDT by jackieh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

On second read, I understand. SS was previously assigned to someone born in 1890.


125 posted on 10/11/2009 12:46:42 PM PDT by listenhillary (A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Yes, but isn’t there a “natural security” predicate required to invoke this EO? And even at that, the decision can be appealed, which may cause even more news than the fact itself.

ex animo
davidfarrar


126 posted on 10/11/2009 12:47:32 PM PDT by DavidFarrar (davidfarrar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

Get Spyware Doctor and let it update when it wants to, which may be several times a day if there is a lot of crap going on. During the election it was updating 5-6 or more times a day. Now it has slowed back down. Since I got it, I have had it block tons of things, not one has gotten in. I use Norton too but Norton alone isn’t enough.
Spyware doctor is highly recommended by PC magazine and C-Net.


127 posted on 10/11/2009 12:48:44 PM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Excuse my ignorance but who is Susan Daniels and why is an affadavit from her important?

It's not ignorance, Daniels is not exactly a household name. She's simply a private investigator, who has been quoted about duplicate Social Security numbers in the past:

According to Susan Daniels, of Daniels and Associates Investigations, Inc. in Chardon Ohio, when searching through database aggregators such as IRB, it is common to find a subject referenced with two or three Social Security Numbers (SSN). Here are some of the reasons a person may show-up with multiple SSN’s:

Note that in Daniels' linked affidavit, she is not saying that the SS# found for Obama is invalid. She is simply saying that it fits into a series issued in Connecticut between 1977-1979.

She is also saying that the same number "may have been assigned" to someone born in 1890.

In other words, she leaves open the possibility of error as outlined in her above quote.


128 posted on 10/11/2009 12:49:26 PM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact" - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sten
1890?? social security didn’t exist at that time

So what if it didn't exist in 1890? The fact remains, that there were at least 844,472 Social Security numbers issued to people born in 1890.

Just because a person is dead, does it make it okay for Barack Hussein Obama to steal their identity? Why is he above the law? Why is he using multiple identities and multiple passports? Why is he hiding his birth certificate? Why were his selective service records doctored up?

Why is he too good to pay his parking tickets? Why is this common criminal holding the highest office in this country?
129 posted on 10/11/2009 12:50:34 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mlo

no mistake and this is old news

Check out the most used number (042———)and addresses associated with it like Chicago, Illinois:

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/look-at-this-huge-list-of-properties.html


130 posted on 10/11/2009 12:52:03 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
Yes, but isn’t there a “natural security” predicate required to invoke this EO?

I don't know. All I can say about this is there are people who believe that the same EO that restricted access to Bush documents also restricted access to Obama's, just based on previous discussions on this subject.

But that seems pretty odd since Bush's documents would be eight years of presidential papers, and Obama's just civilian documents, and some records held by the government, i.e., IRS, draft registration, passports, etc. Of course one could see why he might want those sealed.

131 posted on 10/11/2009 12:53:51 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: mlo

My thought is, why wasn’t there some documentation attached to the affidavit? Nothing in affidavit to link it to this Obama, or how it was located or anything. If Orly by some stroke of luck, has anything, she has best get it out in public.

parsy, who says this affidavit is about like the one from the ebay guy


132 posted on 10/11/2009 12:56:12 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

There is nothing named Google allowed on any of my computers and I check my register every week just to make sure. I detest Google. If I use Google, I go through another server.


133 posted on 10/11/2009 1:01:26 PM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
Concord, New Hampshire, resident Grace D. Owen was issued the first card typed in Concord, which because of the numbering scheme happened to be the card with the lowest possible number: 001-01-0001.

Name : GRACE MUZZEY
Birth : 16 Apr 1902
Death : Dec 1975
Last Residence : 03301 (Concord, Merrimack, NH)
SSN : 001-01-0001
Issued : New Hampshire
134 posted on 10/11/2009 1:09:50 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Better questions would be ‘whom was the number assigned to before Barry used it, was that person ever living in HI and banking at Stanley Ann's mother's bank or involved with the Ford Foundation micro-loan program, and when did the person die whose number Barry used from Connecticut?
135 posted on 10/11/2009 1:11:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
...My thought is, why wasn’t there some documentation attached to the affidavit? Nothing in affidavit to link it to this Obama, or how it was located or anything. If Orly by some stroke of luck, has anything, she has best get it out in public.....

There are databases available that allow one to input a name or address and come back with “related” Social Security numbers. They are not absolutes because of the method of compiling the databases, such as from credit applications, rental applications, school applications, etc.

Only the Social Security Administration can definitely confirm where and when Obama was issued a SS and they will have an application on file. This is not releasable without Obama’s permission or court order due to the Privacy Act. It is claimed Obama’s first job and W-2 was from a Baskin=Robbins in Hawaii. If he was issued a SS while residing in Hawaii it should start with 575 or 576.

Obama should also have filled out an I-9 for his recent jobs including US Senator and President. try and get the info he used to back that up, better yet try and find out who in the US Government as his employer has his I-9 then let me know. :

http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf

136 posted on 10/11/2009 1:14:26 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment; nuconvert; LucyT; Red Steel; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; pissant; BP2; David; ...
Ms. Daniels is not necessarily correct about O actually using these multiple SS#s. I am familiar with the type of data base which may lead one to such a conclusion. The same person may be associated with multiple SS #s in the data base, but it's impossible to tell how the data base collected that information. One possibility is that others totally unknown and unconnected to the subject are using his name with a bunch of SS#s they have somehow gathered, the SS#s not originally assigned to that individual.

In other words, a fraud artist can use a bogus name with multiple bogus SS #s, depending on the particular transaction he is engages in.

No, I'm not trying to play O's defense attorney, but it seems he may have a benign (relevant to himself) explanation for this particular finding. The manager of the data base might be able to shed more light on this issue.

137 posted on 10/11/2009 1:17:29 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Why would Barry Obama, a 15-year-old student in Hawaii, need to steal a Social Security number???? That makes no sense.

You need to prove you are a citizen to get a SS Number, you need a valid birth cert.

138 posted on 10/11/2009 1:18:24 PM PDT by sportutegrl (If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Isn’t that what the signed statement says?

No, that is not what it says. Maybe you should put your glasses on and read it again.

How could the SS have been used in 1890?

It couldn't have been used in 1890 because Social Security numbers did not exist in 1890 when the person who's identity that Obama decided to steal was born.
139 posted on 10/11/2009 1:18:38 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

“Why would Barry Obama, a 15-year-old student in Hawaii, need to steal a Social Security number???? That makes no sense.”

Because he wasn’t/isn’t a US citizen??


140 posted on 10/11/2009 1:20:27 PM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson