Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ajnin

I agree. There is no “legal” obligation, according to the wimp, sissy-pants court, for someone wearing a badge to protect.

Well, if you’re going to be a peace officer (ancient term back when honor and duty meant something) you should, sorta, kinda fulfill your oath. If not, go weave baskets.

So I’m not about to play the “legal obligation” game. I’m sure you know that “legality” can be twisted into a pretzel by any good shyster lawyer in our goofy, non-sensical court sytem.

What else you got besides some liberal’s interpretation of “legal interpretation.”

BTW, I agree with your inference that we each, whether on land, sea or air, need to personally protect ourselves and our family.

I also agree with your pointed assertion that our criminal, fascist government doesn’t give a spit about us.

This is amazing: I agree with two of three of your points. Hell, we’re almost blood brothers in philosophy.


64 posted on 10/10/2009 5:58:20 PM PDT by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: sergeantdave

There’s no legal obligation to protect every person primarily because it is impossible to do so.


224 posted on 10/11/2009 1:48:28 PM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson