That's like saying having a piece of program code gives you the blueprint of the programmer.
What we're doing right now is just learning to read to program code and finding out what the program does.
At this point taking what little we know now and saying we know enough from that to identify the programmer seems a tad out there.
What we're doing right now is just learning to read to program code and finding out what the program does.
At this point taking what little we know now and saying we know enough from that to identify the programmer seems a tad out there.”
Well, we know some things and learning more everyday. We know DNA is rich with complex, specified information. Who said anything about identifying the programmer? I do not know who the programmer (of DNA) is, and have not said that I do. I have said that the programmer may well be an intelligent agent since such agents are the only cause we know to-date that can produce such information. Do you have a credible alternative explanation? You don't have to know the programmer to recognize a program.