Well the thread was about evolution (at least when GGG spammed it-one of five on the same exact subject in 5 days last week).Problem is that even when the creationists start a thread on evolution, other creationists turn it to origins.
Life , or the building blocks of it could have even come from another planet or space. There is a lot more evidence for that hypothesis than ID. There are a lot of organic molecules floating around out there in space and lots of water (ice) too.
Life , or the building blocks of it could have even come from another planet or space. There is a lot more evidence for that hypothesis than ID. There are a lot of organic molecules floating around out there in space and lots of water (ice) too.”
Well, sorry. My initial post was to someone (I don't think a creationist) who commented on computer code and DNA.
I would respectfully disagree on the best evidence of origins. Organic molecules and ice is long way from a self replicating, metabolic organism. I think if that is best evidence for a naturalistic explanation of the origin of information, I would say there is no credible naturalistic explanation.