Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas firm will tap power of the Gulf
Houston Chronicle ^ | Oct. 8, 2009 | TOM FOWLER

Posted on 10/09/2009 8:42:42 AM PDT by kingattax

A Texas firm plans to use power generated by the Gulf of Mexico's waves to make its salty water drinkable.

Renew Blue Inc. says its project can address two global problems — climate change and scarce drinking water — by using clean energy to turn seawater to freshwater. The company has a lease from the state of Texas to place the facility in 25 feet of water about a mile off the coast from Freeport.

It will use 18 specially designed, wave-powered pumps to send water over a wheel that will turn a small electric turbine. Power from the turbine will light the platform and run a 3,000-gallon-per-day desalination plant, said Doug Sandberg, vice president of Renew Blue's parent company, Independent Natural Resources Inc.

The desalinated water will be stored in a 30,000-gallon tank on the platform and then transported to shore, where it will be put in bottles made from corn-based plastic and marketed under the Renew Blue brand.

The idea of generating electricity via ocean waves and currents has been around for several decades but is still in its early stages. Six percent of U.S. electricity came from hydroelectric dams in 2008, according to the Department of Energy.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: energy; wavepower

1 posted on 10/09/2009 8:42:42 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I hope the taxpayers aren’t subsidizing this failure in the making.


2 posted on 10/09/2009 8:45:50 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The Gulf of Mexico is flat as a lake in the summer.


3 posted on 10/09/2009 8:46:23 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

How about tapping the power of Alfred Nobel as he sets a new RPM record in his grave.


4 posted on 10/09/2009 8:49:47 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("The President has borrowed more money to spend to less effect than anybody on the planet. " Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The delivered cost per gallon of water out of this will be astronomical, but the green jobs grants will more than make up for it. This will be the paradigm for the “new economy”: Quadruple the price for deliverables but justfiy it on the grounds of carbon credits and subsidies granted. Ugh, ugh, ugh. They forgot the solar powered timeclock at the plant entrance.


5 posted on 10/09/2009 8:50:02 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

And the next big hurricane, the plant will be destroyed so taxpayers can pay to rebuild it.


6 posted on 10/09/2009 8:51:23 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

LOL


7 posted on 10/09/2009 8:54:02 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

corn-based plastic ?

how about a lot of bovine-based excrement ?


8 posted on 10/09/2009 8:55:49 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Isn’t FEMA money all “free” money?


9 posted on 10/09/2009 8:56:02 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I ain’t drinking any water that comes from the GOM. Desalinization doesn’t take out Mississippi pollution that makes its way down here.


10 posted on 10/09/2009 9:06:48 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

“Desalinization doesn’t take out Mississippi pollution that makes its way down here.”

Another good point. Though there’s probably some angle that will thereby make it eligible for a double subsidy.


11 posted on 10/09/2009 9:15:08 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“The idea of generating electricity via ocean waves and currents has been around for several decades but is still in its early stages. Six percent of U.S. electricity came from hydroelectric dams in 2008, according to the Department of Energy.”

The conflation of those two statements is really stretching it. The idea of generating electricity by “water turning wheels around” has been around for a solid century.


12 posted on 10/09/2009 9:17:07 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
I ain’t drinking any water that comes from the GOM. Desalinization doesn’t take out Mississippi pollution that makes its way down here.

Each bottle will come with a complimentary tar ball. Kinda like a worm in a tequila bottle, doncha know.

13 posted on 10/09/2009 9:17:52 AM PDT by OBXWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The desalinated water will be stored in a 30,000-gallon tank on the platform and then transported to shore, where it will be put in bottles made from corn-based plastic and marketed under the Renew Blue brand.

LOL! At $2 a pint, they'll make a small fortune marketing this to the bottled-water boobs who think this technology can be scaled up economically for our public water supply.

It's creative and ingenious!!!

I wish I had thought of it!!!

14 posted on 10/09/2009 9:22:50 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

ROFL


15 posted on 10/09/2009 10:05:00 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
the liberal elitist idiots will drink it,just cause it will be green, and cost about $2.50 per bottle. Same people who purchase Starbucks coffee, just cause it costs $4 per cup. Starbucks = swill.

Elitist thinking, if it costs more the little people can't buy it, but we can. It's a club thing.

16 posted on 10/09/2009 10:09:15 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson