Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

“River”? “Vermont”? “Breast Feeding at TWO”? MOOOOOOOOONBATS!


3 posted on 10/09/2009 6:48:44 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: massgopguy

Why?


21 posted on 10/09/2009 6:58:28 AM PDT by svcw (Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: massgopguy
IN addition to breastfeeding being perfectly natural way past two years of age, there are studies that show that women who breastfeed for long periods of time gain health benefits:

A 2009 study indicates long duration of lactation (at least 24 months) is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease.

According to a Malmö University study published in 2009, women who breast fed for a longer duration have a lower risk for contracting rheumatoid arthritis than women who breast fed for a shorter duration or who had never breast fed.

So breastfeeding a 22-month-old is actually smart, and not at all "moonbat" worthy. A typical moonbat won't breastfeed at all because they have to turn their kid over to the state so they can get back to working like a good feminist.

145 posted on 10/09/2009 10:05:17 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson