Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

In most States breastfeeding is a legally protected activity. That’s the difference.


2 posted on 10/09/2009 6:47:08 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Legally protected exposure as well?


5 posted on 10/09/2009 6:48:56 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Leaving the legal wranglings to others, I think breastfeeding should be accommodated generally and performed discreetly.


8 posted on 10/09/2009 6:51:40 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Yeah, I looked it up. Yer right. Here’s Vermont’s law:

This act states that the general assembly finds that breastfeeding a child is an important, basic and natural act of nurture that should be encouraged in the interest of enhancing maternal, child and family health, and amends the discrimination laws to provide that a mother may breastfeed her child in any place of public accommodation in which the mother and child would otherwise have a legal right to be.

Oh well. I’m wrong.


10 posted on 10/09/2009 6:52:49 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

You know really freaks out the boobie flippers?

Stop and watch....lick your lips.....they will cover up real quick...

My wife hates it when I do it...but it ALLWAYS works...

I once asked a woman sitting with her man in the middle of the food court at the mall....”since you got one out..can I see the other?”

Even her man laughed...but if looks could kill, she would have struck us both down.......boy I bet he was in trouble when he got home...

*snicker*


12 posted on 10/09/2009 6:53:46 AM PDT by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
In most States breastfeeding is a legally protected activity. That’s the difference.

Its not illegal to have sex either, but the seat of an airplane is a bad choice of locations.

If its inappropriate for a non-lactating breast to be hung out in public, so too is it inappropriate for a lactating breast to be hung out.

Covering up is quite simple and in no way hinders nursing.

As these cases always seem to involve a nursing toddler (or older), I chock it up to crazy women on power trips.

13 posted on 10/09/2009 6:53:48 AM PDT by SampleMan (No one should die on a gov. waiting list., or go broke because the gov. has dictated their salary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

In most States breastfeeding is a legally protected activity. That’s the difference.”

Is there not an expectation of some level of modesty on the part of the breastfeeding mother?

I agree that breastfeeding is ‘natural’, but I certainly don’t expect to pay for an airline seat and have a boob hanging out in the aisle seat.

She was politely asked to cover up her chest and she refused.

I hope the judge throws this out and gives her a tonguelashing at the same time.


31 posted on 10/09/2009 7:06:55 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Just to muddy the mix. FEDERAL law requires passengers OBEY crew member instructions. Airline flights are interstate trade. FEDERAL law likely has jurisdiction.

IMHO.


34 posted on 10/09/2009 7:07:55 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Legally protected, maybe. But, in this instance, it seems like a reasonable request for the mother to observe some degree of propriety and decorum in the confined space in which this took place. Just seems to be common sense...

But, common sense is in pretty short supply these days.


39 posted on 10/09/2009 7:09:07 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

This is a federal lawsuit. There is no federal “right to breastfeed.” It would be interesting to know whether she is bringing a state law claim in federal court, or if she is trying to make a Title VII claim out of this.

If it’s a federal claim, that would explain the three year time lag. You have to file an administrative claim before filing a federal claim, and that can take three years.

In any event, I hope she loses.


54 posted on 10/09/2009 7:13:30 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

70 posted on 10/09/2009 7:24:07 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Yet in some of those same states, a woman just wiping out a boob in public for fun would be in legal trouble. I have no problem with women breastfeeding an infant, but there are ways to do it without making a public spectacle of it.

The double-standard is stunning. Whats wrong with discrete?


91 posted on 10/09/2009 7:40:27 AM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson